The 4MAT Model and Design Thinking both focus on improving creativity and problem-solving,
but they approach these goals in slightly different ways.
However, they complement each other, and their overlap is evident in how both frameworks address human-centered design and the need for empathy in the problem-solving process.
Here’s a breakdown of how the 4MAT Model relates to the theory of Design Thinking:
1. 4MAT Model Overview: The 4MAT Model, developed by Bernice McCarthy, is a framework for teaching and learning that is based on the understanding that people learn in different ways. The model divides learning into four quadrants:
• Quadrant 1 (Why): Why is this important? This appeals to the emotional side of learning, making connections to personal relevance and motivating learners. • Quadrant 2 (What): What do I need to know? This focuses on the information, facts, and concepts that learners need to understand.
• Quadrant 3 (How): How do I apply what I’ve learned? This emphasizes practical application and hands-on learning.
• Quadrant 4 (What if): What if I could explore alternatives?
This encourages creativity, innovation, and future possibilities. The 4MAT Model is often used to enhance teaching and communication by tailoring the learning experience to different cognitive styles.
2. Design Thinking Overview: Design Thinking is a human-centered approach to problem-solving and innovation. It typically follows five phases:
• Empathize: Understand the needs and problems of users.
• Define: Clearly articulate the problem based on the insights gathered.
• Ideate: Generate a wide range of ideas and solutions. • Prototype: Create prototypes of potential solutions to explore and test.
• Test: Test prototypes and solutions, iterating as necessary.
The goal of Design Thinking is to create solutions that meet the needs of users while also being feasible and viable from a technical and business standpoint.
3. Relation Between 4MAT and Design Thinking: • Empathy (4MAT Quadrant 1 & Design Thinking's "Empathize" phase): Both frameworks emphasize the importance of understanding people's needs and feelings. In the 4MAT model, Quadrant 1 (Why) focuses on the emotional connection and personal relevance, which aligns with the "Empathize" phase of Design Thinking. The need to connect with users on an emotional level in Design Thinking parallels the 4MAT emphasis on addressing personal relevance.
• Learning and Information Gathering (4MAT Quadrant 2 & Design Thinking's "Define" phase): Quadrant 2 of 4MAT focuses on gathering facts and information to better understand the topic at hand, which aligns with the "Define" phase of Design Thinking, where the problem is defined based on insights gathered during the empathy process. Both frameworks require a deep understanding of the situation or problem before proceeding with creative solutions.
• Application and Exploration (4MAT Quadrant 3 & Design Thinking's "Ideate" and "Prototype" phases): Quadrant 3 of the 4MAT Model is about applying knowledge, which correlates with Design Thinking's "Ideate" and "Prototype" phases. In these stages, you generate solutions and begin testing them in practical, hands-on ways. The focus on learning by doing in the 4MAT Model is mirrored in the iterative, experimental process of prototyping and ideation in Design Thinking.
• Innovation and Possibilities (4MAT Quadrant 4 & Design Thinking's "Test" phase): Quadrant 4 in the 4MAT model encourages thinking about what could be, which aligns with the "Test" phase of Design Thinking. In this phase, solutions are tested, and new possibilities are explored. It’s about iterating, refining, and challenging assumptions—just as Quadrant 4 pushes learners to think outside the box and explore new ideas.
4. Complementary Strengths:
• Human-Centered Focus: Both the 4MAT Model and Design Thinking emphasize the importance of understanding people—whether it’s the learner in the case of the 4MAT model or the end-users in Design Thinking. Both frameworks stress empathy, which is a key element in both effective learning and design processes.
• Iterative Process: The 4MAT Model’s cyclical approach to learning (moving through the quadrants repeatedly) mirrors the iterative nature of Design Thinking. In both approaches, the process is not linear but rather cyclical, allowing for continuous refinement and improvement.
Conclusion: While the 4MAT Model and Design Thinking originate from different disciplines—education and design, respectively—they both emphasize empathy, iterative problem-solving, and creativity.
The 4MAT Model provides a structured way of thinking about how people learn and approach problems, while Design Thinking provides a process for designing solutions that meet real-world needs. Together, they can be powerful tools for fostering innovation in a way that is both human-centered and highly effective.
However, they complement each other, and their overlap is evident in how both frameworks address human-centered design and the need for empathy in the problem-solving process.
Here’s a breakdown of how the 4MAT Model relates to the theory of Design Thinking:
1. 4MAT Model Overview: The 4MAT Model, developed by Bernice McCarthy, is a framework for teaching and learning that is based on the understanding that people learn in different ways. The model divides learning into four quadrants:
• Quadrant 1 (Why): Why is this important? This appeals to the emotional side of learning, making connections to personal relevance and motivating learners. • Quadrant 2 (What): What do I need to know? This focuses on the information, facts, and concepts that learners need to understand.
• Quadrant 3 (How): How do I apply what I’ve learned? This emphasizes practical application and hands-on learning.
• Quadrant 4 (What if): What if I could explore alternatives?
This encourages creativity, innovation, and future possibilities. The 4MAT Model is often used to enhance teaching and communication by tailoring the learning experience to different cognitive styles.
2. Design Thinking Overview: Design Thinking is a human-centered approach to problem-solving and innovation. It typically follows five phases:
• Empathize: Understand the needs and problems of users.
• Define: Clearly articulate the problem based on the insights gathered.
• Ideate: Generate a wide range of ideas and solutions. • Prototype: Create prototypes of potential solutions to explore and test.
• Test: Test prototypes and solutions, iterating as necessary.
The goal of Design Thinking is to create solutions that meet the needs of users while also being feasible and viable from a technical and business standpoint.
3. Relation Between 4MAT and Design Thinking: • Empathy (4MAT Quadrant 1 & Design Thinking's "Empathize" phase): Both frameworks emphasize the importance of understanding people's needs and feelings. In the 4MAT model, Quadrant 1 (Why) focuses on the emotional connection and personal relevance, which aligns with the "Empathize" phase of Design Thinking. The need to connect with users on an emotional level in Design Thinking parallels the 4MAT emphasis on addressing personal relevance.
• Learning and Information Gathering (4MAT Quadrant 2 & Design Thinking's "Define" phase): Quadrant 2 of 4MAT focuses on gathering facts and information to better understand the topic at hand, which aligns with the "Define" phase of Design Thinking, where the problem is defined based on insights gathered during the empathy process. Both frameworks require a deep understanding of the situation or problem before proceeding with creative solutions.
• Application and Exploration (4MAT Quadrant 3 & Design Thinking's "Ideate" and "Prototype" phases): Quadrant 3 of the 4MAT Model is about applying knowledge, which correlates with Design Thinking's "Ideate" and "Prototype" phases. In these stages, you generate solutions and begin testing them in practical, hands-on ways. The focus on learning by doing in the 4MAT Model is mirrored in the iterative, experimental process of prototyping and ideation in Design Thinking.
• Innovation and Possibilities (4MAT Quadrant 4 & Design Thinking's "Test" phase): Quadrant 4 in the 4MAT model encourages thinking about what could be, which aligns with the "Test" phase of Design Thinking. In this phase, solutions are tested, and new possibilities are explored. It’s about iterating, refining, and challenging assumptions—just as Quadrant 4 pushes learners to think outside the box and explore new ideas.
4. Complementary Strengths:
• Human-Centered Focus: Both the 4MAT Model and Design Thinking emphasize the importance of understanding people—whether it’s the learner in the case of the 4MAT model or the end-users in Design Thinking. Both frameworks stress empathy, which is a key element in both effective learning and design processes.
• Iterative Process: The 4MAT Model’s cyclical approach to learning (moving through the quadrants repeatedly) mirrors the iterative nature of Design Thinking. In both approaches, the process is not linear but rather cyclical, allowing for continuous refinement and improvement.
Conclusion: While the 4MAT Model and Design Thinking originate from different disciplines—education and design, respectively—they both emphasize empathy, iterative problem-solving, and creativity.
The 4MAT Model provides a structured way of thinking about how people learn and approach problems, while Design Thinking provides a process for designing solutions that meet real-world needs. Together, they can be powerful tools for fostering innovation in a way that is both human-centered and highly effective.
Created with
