Sep 18 / Michael McCarthy

Fostering a Growth Mindset Through the 4MAT Model of Learning

This white paper explores the alignment between the 4MAT Model of Learning and growth mindset principles, contrasting these with the fixed mindset perspective.

Drawing on educational theory and neuroscience, it illustrates how 4MAT's cyclical, inclusive structure encourages personal development, resilience, and a dynamic approach to learning. 

The paper positions the 4MAT model not only as a teaching strategy but as a philosophical framework that nurtures learners' belief in their capacity to grow.

Introduction

In educational psychology, two dominant theories of learner disposition—growth mindset and fixed mindset—shape how individuals approach challenges, feedback, and personal development. Coined by Carol Dweck, these mindsets determine whether a learner sees ability as malleable or static. Simultaneously, the 4MAT Model, developed by Bernice McCarthy, a structured approach to instructional design that supports a diverse range of learners by engaging multiple learning styles.

This paper explores how the 4MAT Model promotes a growth mindset and examines how it contrasts with the assumptions of a fixed mindset learning paradigm.

Theoretical Foundations



Characteristic

Growth Mindset


Fixed
Mindset		Belief about ability
Can be developed


Is inherent and unchangeable		Response to failure
Sees as learning opportunity

Sees as personal limitation		Role of effort

Essential for success


Suggests lack of natural talent		Approach to feedback
Seeks and uses constructively

Avoids or deflects

Growth vs. Fixed Mindset
Growth Mindset (Carol Dweck):
Belief that intelligence and abilities can be developed through effort, feedback, and persistence. Failure is viewed as an opportunity to learn.
Fixed Mindset:
Belief that intelligence and abilities are static traits. Effort is seen as fruitless if one lacks innate ability. Mistakes often discourage further attempts.

The 4MAT Model of Learning
The 4MAT Model is a four-quadrant instructional framework based on how people learn:
Q1: Why? Goal to Motivate– Engage learners emotionally and reflectively.
Q2: What? – Goal to Inform - Deliver conceptual knowledge and facts.
Q3: How? Goal to Apply – Provide opportunities for hands-on experimentation.
Q4: What If? Goal - To Evaluate and Adapt – Encourage adaptation, creativity, and application in new ways.

Each quadrant supports different learner preferences, including experiential, analytical, practical, and imaginative approaches.

How the 4MAT Model Promotes a Growth Mindset

Embracing Diverse Learning Pathways
4MAT honors individual differences in how people learn, implicitly rejecting a “one-size-fits-all” approach that reinforces fixed ability categorizations. By validating each learner’s strengths and providing multiple access points to content, the model encourages learners to stretch beyond their comfort zones.

Growth Alignment:
Encourages all learners to access material regardless of starting point. Supports the idea that competence is gained, not given.

Cyclical and Reflective Learning
The 4MAT cycle ensures continuous revisiting of concepts through different lenses, enabling deeper understanding and reinforcing learning through iteration—a core feature of growth-oriented environments.

Growth Alignment:
Reinforces learning as a process.
Emphasizes that mastery emerges over time.

Inquiry and Application (Quadrants 3 and 4)
In the “How?” and “What If?” stages, learners are asked to take risks, test ideas, and explore novel scenarios. This hands-on, adaptive approach promotes resilience and experimentation—key tenets of a growth mindset.

Growth Alignment:
Encourages learning through failure and feedback.
Promotes curiosity and creativity as learning tools.

Teacher as Facilitator, Not Authority
The 4MAT model shifts educators from deliverers of knowledge to designers of learning experiences. This partnership fosters student agency, which is critical to developing a growth mindset.

Growth Alignment:
Builds student ownership and intrinsic motivation.
Encourages self-efficacy and autonomy.

Fixed Mindset Pedagogy: A Contrast
Traditional instruction often aligns with a fixed mindset:
Linear delivery: Emphasis on rote learning and right answers.
Performance over process: Success measured by test scores, not growth.
Static grouping: Labeling students by ability discourages growth and experimentation.
By contrast, 4MAT's dynamic, inclusive design:
Redefines success as growth over time.
Normalizes mistakes as part of the learning journey.
Disrupts the narrative that only certain types of learners can excel.

Implications for Educators and Institutions
Adopting the 4MAT model in classrooms and professional development can:
Reduce learned helplessness and fear of failure.
Improve learner engagement and adaptability.
Encourage lifelong learning dispositions.
Institutions should consider:
Training teachers in mindset theory and 4MAT application.
Redesigning curricula to support cyclical, multimodal learning.
Assessing learning through growth indicators, not static benchmarks.

"If you can find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn't lead anywhere."

Conclusion
The 4MAT Model of Learning provides more than a structure for instruction—it’s a framework that inherently promotes the values and behaviors associated with a growth mindset. By enabling learners to engage with content through multiple dimensions, it challenges the limitations of fixed mindset paradigms and fosters a culture of persistence, creativity, and self-belief.

References
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.

McCarthy, B. (1987). The 4MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques. EXCEL, Inc.

Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the Brain in Mind. ASCD.
Sousa, D. A. (2016). How the Brain Learns. Corwin.
Created with